Cash
Debate began decades back about direct transfer of money to the poor and continues. Politicians who themselves are creations of elections, oppose formal distribution of cash to the poor or direct transfer of cash via the state . People can be imparted skills and given goods but the poor cannot be trusted with cash and its direct transfer? While the companies who understand cash better are the ones who adopt the suggestion wholeheartedly. They offer cash back, directly in your account, if you buy with credit or debit cards or use online payment apps. So, if you have some purchasing power, you are part of the cash back scheme. You can be an immediate beneficiary. Elections are supposed to fall outside the realm of financial and monetary influences in order to secure that they are 'free'. People, representatives and intermediaries understand the relationship between elections and cash as immediate and direct. Though there is an official limit to the amount a candidate c...